MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387623741 · doi:10.1109/tim.2023.3324342

Initial On-Sky Performance Testing of the Single-Photon Imager for Nanosecond Astrophysics (SPINA) System

2023· article· en· W4387623741 on OpenAlexaff
Albert Wai Kit Lau, Nurzhan Shaimoldin, Zhanat Maksut, Yan Yan Chan, Mehdi Shafiee, B. Grossan, George F. Smoot

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCalibration and Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics
FundersNazarbayev UniversityMinistry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan
KeywordsPhysicsSkyTelescopeObservatoryPhotomultiplierStarsAstronomyRemote sensingDetectorAstrophysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work presents an initial on-sky performance measurement of the Single-Photon Imager for Nanosecond Astro-physics (SPINA) system, part of our Ultra-Fast Astronomy (UFA) program. We developed the SPINA system based on the position-sensitive silicon photomultiplier (PS-SiPM) detector to record both temporal and spatial information of detected photons. The initial on-sky testing of the SPINA system was conducted on UT 2022 Jul 10, with the Nazarbayev University Transient Telescope at the Assy-Turgen Astrophysical Observatory (NUTTelA-TAO), studied stars with a wide range of brightness and a dark region of the sky without starsm, affected by atmospheric conditions; a background noise level of 1914 counts per second (cps) within this resolution element; and crosstalk probability of ~ 0.18 near the detector’s center while reaching ~ 0.5 at the edges. We derived a 5σ sensitivity of 17.45 Gaia-BP magnitude in a 1s exposure with no atmospheric extinction. Based on a false alarm rate of once per 100 nights, The SPINA system provides a transient sensitivity of 14.06 mag on a 10ms window and a 15 P.E. detection threshold forsub- μstime scale, limited by crosstalk. In addition, the SPINA system proved its capability to detect rapid alterations in the stellar profile: a variation of ±1.8% in the stellar profile FWHM under 20msexposure and ±5% change under 2msexposures, as well as capturing stellar light curves on themsand μsscales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementSame topicCalibration and Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207