MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387623800 · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2023.3319694

A New Oversampling Method Based on Triangulation of Sample Space

2023· article· en· W4387623800 on OpenAlexaff
Yueqi Chen, Witold Pedrycz, Jian Wang, Chao Zhang, Jie Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace and Expression Recognition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsOversamplingSample (material)TriangulationSpace (punctuation)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceGeographyCartographyPhysicsTelecommunicationsBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coping with imbalanced data is a challenging task in practical classification problems. One of effective methods to solve imbalanced problems is to oversample the minority class. Gls SMOTE is a classical oversampling method. However, it exhibits two disadvantages, namely, a linear generation and overgeneralization. In this article, an improved synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) method, FE- SMOTE, is proposed based on the idea of the method of finite elements. FE- SMOTE not only overcomes the above two disadvantages of SMOTE but also can generate samples that are more in line with the density distribution of the original minority class than those generated by the existing SMOTE variants. The originality of the proposed method stems from constructing a simplex for every minority sample and then triangulating it to expand the region of synthetic samples from lines to space. A new definition of the relative size for triangular elements not only helps determine the number of synthetic samples but also weakens the adverse impact of outliers. Generated samples by FE- SMOTE can effectively reflect the local potential distribution structure arising around every minority sample. Compared with 16 commonly studied oversampling methods, FE- SMOTE produces promising results quantified in terms of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$G$ </tex-math></inline-formula> -mean, AUC, <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$F$ </tex-math></inline-formula> -measure, and accuracy on 22 benchmark imbalanced datasets and the big dataset MNIST.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.722

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics SystemsSame topicFace and Expression RecognitionFrench-language works237,207