MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387629015 · doi:10.1145/3582269.3615597

Player-Guided AI outperforms standard AI in Sequence Alignment Puzzles

2023· article· en· W4387629015 on OpenAlexafffund
Renata Mutalova, Roman Sarrazin‐Gendron, Parham Ghasemloo Gheidari, Eddie Cai, Gabriel Richard, Sébastien Caisse, Rob Knight, Mathieu Blanchette, Attila Szantner, Jérôme Waldispühl

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScientific Computing and Data Management
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersGenome Canada
KeywordsLeverage (statistics)Computer sciencePopularityArtificial intelligenceGeneralizationBridging (networking)Collective intelligenceMachine learningTraining setApplications of artificial intelligenceSequence (biology)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although Artificial Intelligence (AI) has gained widespread popularity across different fields, it is essential to recognize that AI systems, while impressive, do not consistently exhibit robust generalization, particularly for difficult problems such as the Multiple Sequence Alignment (MSA). In this study, we focus on bridging this performance gap by integrating human solutions into AI training. To illustrate these principles, we leverage data from Borderlands Science, a popular citizen science game in which small instances of the MSA problem are represented as puzzles. Our goal is to leverage the collective intelligence of human players to enhance the capabilities of AI agents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.260
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicScientific Computing and Data ManagementFrench-language works237,207