MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387640222 · doi:10.1080/10407782.2023.2266569

Stagnation point flow of magnetized Cu–Cuo–water nano liquid via a porous dissipative stretching surface: A theoretical investigation

2023· article· en· W4387640222 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNumerical Heat Transfer Part A Applications · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanofluidPorous mediumMechanicsStagnation pointMaterials scienceOrdinary differential equationBoundary layerDissipative systemDimensionless quantityThermodynamicsPartial differential equationHeat transferPorosityPhysicsMathematicsDifferential equationComposite materialMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nanotechnology is progressively being used to increase heat transfer rates by employing an efficient homogenous combination of nanoparticles. Inspired by these developments, a simulation investigation of porous media subjected to stagnation point flow under the effects of dissipation and uneven thermal sink/generation boundary layer is performed. Dimensionless forms of the governing equations are obtained by adopting a model of Tiwari–Das nanofluid to study the fluid flow considering water-based Cu and Cuo nanoparticles. A coupled ordinary derivative invariant model is obtained from the transformed partial differentiation equations. A computational shooting method with a fourth-order Runge–Kutta scheme is used to offer solutions to the ODEs (Ordinary Differential Equations). This study was done to understand the impacts of pertinent physical terms on the flow characteristics in porous media. Additionally, the wall quantities, thermal, and concentration diffusion are examined and discussed, and the output is presented in plots and tables. The limiting cases are considered and briefly addressed as compared with the existing results. The solution outputs revealed that the heat propagation is momentously influenced by the volume and size of the nanoparticles. The fluid molecular bond is strengthened by the rising induced magnetic field. This investigation is treasured in extensive applications that are not restricted to the physical sciences and engineering.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.398
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it