MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387641635 · doi:10.1142/s2010139223500143

Price Discovery in the CDS Market: Evidence from Corporate Acquisitions

2023· article· en· W4387641635 on OpenAlex
Iuliana Ismailescu, Blake Phillips, Xiaowei Xu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueQuarterly Journal of Finance · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCredit Risk and Financial Regulations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCredit default swapPrice discoveryBusinessMonetary economicsEquity (law)Information asymmetryCorporate governanceFinancial systemiTraxxCredit default swap indexCreditorHedge fundCredit riskFinancial economicsEconomicsFinanceCredit valuation adjustmentFutures contractCredit referenceDebt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the contribution of credit default swaps (CDS) to price discovery in the run-up period preceding an acquisition announcement. We find that the CDS market plays a significant role in price formation before cross-border acquisitions, especially when target firms are from emerging economies. Further, the information flow from the CDS to the equity market is more pronounced when the bidder has a higher risk of default and the target nation has greater information asymmetry, weaker governance, and lower creditor protections. Our results are consistent with preferential use of the CDS market by informed traders ahead of negative credit news to hedge increased default risk or speculatively front-run widening credit spreads.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.337
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it