MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387648546 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3103

The first X-ray polarimetric observation of the black hole binary LMC X-1

2023· article· en· W4387648546 on OpenAlexaff
Jakub Podgorný, Lorenzo Marra, Fabio Muleri, Nicole Rodriguez Cavero, Ajay Ratheesh, Michal Dovčiak, Romana Mikušincová, M. Brigitte, James F. Steiner, Alexandra Veledina, S. Bianchi, H. Krawczynski, Jiří Svoboda, P. Kaaret, G. Matt, Javier A. García, P-O Petrucci, A. Lutovinov, A. Semena, Michela Negro, Martin C. Weisskopf, Adam Ingram, Juri Poutanen, Banafsheh Beheshtipour, Sohee Chun, Kaijing Hu, Tsunefumi Mizuno, Zhang Sixuan, Francesco Tombesi, Silvia Zane, I. Agudo, L. A. Antonelli, Matteo Bachetti, L. Baldini, W. H. Baumgartner, R. Bellazzini, Stephen D. Bongiorno, R. Bonino, A. Brez, N. Bucciantini, Fiamma Capitanio, Simone Castellano, E. Cavazzuti, C Chen, S. Ciprini, E. Costa, E. Del Monte, I. Donnarumma, Victor Doroshenko, Steven R. Ehlert, Teruaki Enoto, Y. Evangelista, Sergio Fabiani, Riccardo Ferrazzoli, Shuichi Gunji, Kentaro Hayashida, Jeremy Heyl, W. Iwakiri, Svetlana G. Jorstad, V. Karas, Fabian Kislat, T. Kitaguchi, Jeffery J. Kolodziejczak, Fabio La Monaca, L. Latronico, Ioannis Liodakis, S. Maldera, Alberto Manfreda, Frédéric Marin, Andrea Marinucci, Alan P. Marscher, Herman L. Marshall, F. Massaro, Ikuyuki Mitsuishi, C-Y Ng, Stephen L. O’Dell, N. Omodei, C. Oppedisano, Alessandro Papitto, George G. Pavlov, Abel L. Peirson, M. Perri, M. Pesce-Rollins, M. Pilia, Andrea Possenti, Simonetta Puccetti, Brian D. Ramsey, John Rankin, O. J. Roberts, Roger W. Romani, C. Sgró, Patrick Slane, P. Soffitta, G. Spandre, Douglas A. Swartz, Toru Tamagawa, F. Tavecchio, Roberto Taverna, Yuzuru Tawara, Allyn F. Tennant, Nicholas E. Thomas, A. Trois, Sergey S. Tsygankov, R. Turolla, Jacco Vink, Kinwah Wu, Fei Xie

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCollege of Natural Resources and Sciences, Humboldt State UniversityIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareIstituto Nazionale di AstrofisicaAgenzia Spaziale ItalianaAcademy of FinlandGrantová Agentura České RepublikyRoyal SocietyMarshall Space Flight CenterNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsPolarization (electrochemistry)Orbital inclinationNeutron starTelescopePolarimetryOrbital planeX-ray binaryBinary numberAstronomyOpticsScattering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We report on an X-ray polarimetric observation of the high-mass X-ray binary LMC X-1 in the high/soft state, obtained by the Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE) in 2022 October. The measured polarization is below the minimum detectable polarization of 1.1 per cent (at the 99 per cent confidence level). Simultaneously, the source was observed with the Neutron Star Interior Composition Explorer (NICER), Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR), and Spectrum-Rontgen-Gamma (SRG)/Astronomical Roentgen Telescope – X-ray Concentrator (ART-XC) instruments, which enabled spectral decomposition into a dominant thermal component and a Comptonized one. The low 2–8 keV polarization of the source did not allow for strong constraints on the black hole spin and inclination of the accretion disc. However, if the orbital inclination of about 36° is assumed, then the upper limit is consistent with predictions for pure thermal emission from geometrically thin and optically thick discs. Assuming the polarization degree of the Comptonization component to be 0, 4, or 10 per cent, and oriented perpendicular to the polarization of the disc emission (in turn assumed to be perpendicular to the large-scale ionization cone orientation detected in the optical band), an upper limit to the polarization of the disc emission of 1.0, 0.9, or 0.9 per cent, respectively, is found (at the 99 per cent confidence level).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsFrench-language works237,207