MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387653926 · doi:10.33844/cjm.2023.6031

A Case Study of Eliminating Urinary Tract Infections for an Elderly Woman with Frequent Recurring UTIs

2023· article· en· W4387653926 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Richard Burns

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPelvic floor disorders treatments
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineShowerMorningUrinary systemUrge incontinenceUrinary incontinenceSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This case study concerns an 84-year-old woman who suffered three UTIs in quick succession after not having had one in over a year. Rather than dealing with these infections once they appeared, it was decided to try and determine what was causing them and then treat this cause. The patient had an over-active bladder and wore incontinence protection to bed at night. One possible cause was infection that could develop from the patient sleeping in soiled incontinence protection. The patient was instructed to shower before going to bed at night and upon arising in the morning. Once this routine was established, the UTIs disappeared. At this writing, the patient has not had a UTI for six months. This success suggests the importance of incontinent women washing before bed and after waking up. For bed ridden patients, or patients in long-term care facilities where daily showers are not possible, perhaps using wet wipes after each bowel movement will also prevent UTIs from occurring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MedicineSame topicPelvic floor disorders treatmentsFrench-language works237,207