Dark matter from hot big bang black holes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
If the temperature of the hot thermal plasma in the early Universe was within a few orders of magnitude of the Planck scale ${M}_{\mathrm{Pl}}$, then the hoop conjecture predicts the formation of microscopic black holes from particle collisions in the plasma. Although these evaporated instantly, they would have left behind a relic abundance of all stable degrees of freedom which couple to gravity. Here we show that, upon minimal assumptions of a high reheat temperature and semiclassical black hole dynamics, this process could have produced the relic abundance of dark matter observed today for a particle mass anywhere in the range of $100\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{keV}\ensuremath{\lesssim}{m}_{\mathrm{dm}}<{M}_{\mathrm{Pl}}$, though it could be subdominant to graviton-mediated freeze-in above ${m}_{\mathrm{dm}}\ensuremath{\sim}\mathrm{MeV}$. The production mechanism does not rely on any additional assumptions about nongravitational dark matter-Standard Model interaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".