MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387668992 · doi:10.1038/s43247-023-01026-7

Co-developing pathways to protect nature, land, territory, and well-being in Amazonia

2023· article· en· W4387668992 on OpenAlexafffund
Rodolfo Nóbrega, Pedro Henrique Lima Alencar, Braulina Baniwa, Mary‐Claire Buell, Pedro Luiz Borges Chaffe, Darlison Munduruku Pinto Correa, Domingos Munduruku do Santos Correa, Tomas F. Domingues, Ayan Santos Fleischmann, Chris Furgal, Leandro Luiz Giatti, Shyrlene Oliveira da Silva Huni Kui, Ninawa Inu Pereira Nunes Huni Kui, Juliana Alves Jenipapo-Kaninde, Hongying Li, Angélica Francisca Mendes Mamede, James Ferreira Moura, Magali F. Nehemy, Raimunda Pinheiro, Paula Ribeiro Prist, Sabina Cerruto Ribeiro, Mateus Tremembé, Evan Bowness, Filipe França, Sharon Stein

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications Earth & Environment · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaTrent University
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesResearch EnglandNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaElizabeth Blackwell Institute for Health Research, University of BristolNational Institutes of HealthMitacsConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloUniversity of Bristol
KeywordsAmazon rainforestGeographyAgroforestryEnvironmental ethicsEcologyEnvironmental scienceBiologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deforestation and climate change threaten social and ecological well-being in Amazonia. Research co-produced through ethical collaborations across multiple knowledge systems can contribute toward just and sustainable futures for the region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.311
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications Earth & EnvironmentSame topicConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207