MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387678912 · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.7371

Report on scipost_202305_00038v1

2023· peer-review· en· W4387678912 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Shachar Fraenkel, Moshe Goldstein

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepeer-review
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum many-body systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAzrieli FoundationIsrael Science Foundation
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Entanglement measures constitute powerful tools in the quantitative description of quantum many-body systems out of equilibrium.We study entanglement in the current-carrying steady state of a paradigmatic one-dimensional model of noninteracting fermions at zero temperature in the presence of a scatterer.We show that disjoint intervals located on opposite sides of the scatterer, and within similar distances from it, maintain volume-law entanglement regardless of their separation, as measured by their fermionic negativity and coherent information.The mutual information of the intervals, which quantifies the total correlations between them, follows a similar scaling.Interestingly, this scaling entails in particular that if the position of one of the intervals is kept fixed, then the correlation measures depend non-monotonically on the distance between the intervals.By deriving exact expressions for the extensive terms of these quantities, we prove their simple functional dependence on the scattering probabilities, and demonstrate that the strong longrange entanglement is generated by the coherence between the transmitted and reflected parts of propagating particles within the bias-voltage window.The generality and simplicity of the model suggest that this behavior should characterize a large class of nonequilibrium steady states.CONTENTS A. Two-point correlations 10 B. Calculation of the Rényi entropies 11 a.Asymptotics of moments for the connected subsystems 11 b.Asymptotics of moments for the disjoint subsystem 13 c.Asymptotics of the Rényi entropies 15 C. Calculation of the fermionic negativity 15 D. Additional numerical tests 20 References 21

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9380.875

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuantum many-body systemsFrench-language works237,207