Quand les entreprises agroalimentaires « végétalisent » leur offre
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Face à l’enjeu sociétal de la transition écologique et alimentaire, cet article cherche à comprendre dans quelle mesure les citoyen·ne·s perçoivent les entreprises agroalimentaires comme des actrices du changement, et la consommation de leurs nouvelles offres végétales comme un moyen d’y participer. Il mobilise les théories de la socio-anthropologie de l’alimentation et s’appuie sur une enquête qualitative menée en 2021 en Île-de-France. L’article propose en premier lieu une typologie des différentes attitudes des citoyen·ne·s face à cet enjeu sociétal. Celle-ci permet de mettre en lumière deux leviers principaux d’engagement des citoyen·ne·s, à savoir la prise de conscience issue d’une expérience personnelle et empirique et la transmission d’informations par le réseau interpersonnel. Grâce à la typologie, l’article analyse ensuite les différentes réactions des citoyen·ne·s face aux offres végétales industrielles et à la communication associée des entreprises. Enfin, il s’interroge sur les efforts d’innovation poursuivis par les industries au regard des demandes des citoyen·ne·s en termes de transparence et d’information.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".