MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387687547 · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2023.1061602

Exploring quantum learning in the smart grid through the evolution of noisy finite fourier series

2023· article· en· W4387687547 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Nader, Marc-André Dubois, Deepa Kundur

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Energy Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceLeverage (statistics)QuantumGridAlgorithmAnomaly detectionNetwork packetReliability (semiconductor)Quantum computerData miningMachine learningArtificial intelligenceMathematicsPhysicsComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The decentralization and softwarization of modern industrial control systems such as the electric grid has resulted in greater efficiency, stability and reliability but these advantages come at a price of higher likelihood of cyberattacks due to the resulting increase in cyberattack surface. Traditional cyberattack detection techniques such as rule-based anomaly detection have an important role to play in first response. However, given the data-rich environment of the modern electric grid, current research thrusts are focused on integrating data-driven machine learning techniques that automatically learn to detect anomalous modes of operation and predict the presence of new attacks. Quantum machine learning (QML) is a subset of machine learning that aims to leverage quantum computers to obtain a learning advantage by means of a training speed-up, data-efficiency, or other form of performance benefit. Questions remain regarding the practical advantages of QML, with the vast majority of existing literature pointing to its greater utility when applied to quantum data rather than classical data, which within a smart grid environment include TCP/IP packets or telemetry measurements. In this paper, we explore a scenario where quantum data may arise in the smart grid, and exploit a quantum algorithmic primitive previously proposed in the literature to demonstrate that in the best-case, QML can provide accuracy advantages of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m1"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>25</mml:mn></mml:math> percentage points when predicting anomalies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.547
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Energy ResearchSame topicQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureFrench-language works237,207