Exploring quantum learning in the smart grid through the evolution of noisy finite fourier series
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The decentralization and softwarization of modern industrial control systems such as the electric grid has resulted in greater efficiency, stability and reliability but these advantages come at a price of higher likelihood of cyberattacks due to the resulting increase in cyberattack surface. Traditional cyberattack detection techniques such as rule-based anomaly detection have an important role to play in first response. However, given the data-rich environment of the modern electric grid, current research thrusts are focused on integrating data-driven machine learning techniques that automatically learn to detect anomalous modes of operation and predict the presence of new attacks. Quantum machine learning (QML) is a subset of machine learning that aims to leverage quantum computers to obtain a learning advantage by means of a training speed-up, data-efficiency, or other form of performance benefit. Questions remain regarding the practical advantages of QML, with the vast majority of existing literature pointing to its greater utility when applied to quantum data rather than classical data, which within a smart grid environment include TCP/IP packets or telemetry measurements. In this paper, we explore a scenario where quantum data may arise in the smart grid, and exploit a quantum algorithmic primitive previously proposed in the literature to demonstrate that in the best-case, QML can provide accuracy advantages of >25 percentage points when predicting anomalies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".