Identity representations during the Montreal Ukrainian Festival: a discursive approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Montreal Ukrainian Festival is an event that takes place annually since 1999 in the neighbourhood of Rosemont, Montreal. It represents an occasion where Ukrainians can gather as well as an opportunity for their community to develop and strengthen their relations with municipal representatives. In the context of the festival, many discourses were stated, be it by Ukrainians or by representatives from the City of Montreal. Using discourse analysis, this article will focus on the construction of the identity of a City and of an ethnocultural community through their mutual relations, using the City of Montreal and its Ukrainian community as an example. It will identify the discourses that were enunciated in the context of the festival to see how the City of Montreal and its Ukrainian community represented their respective identity. Two elements will also be demonstrated: 1. that both Ukrainians and municipal representatives took advantage of the festival to promote a positive identity of their community and their City, and 2. that municipal representatives can use an ethnocultural community to reinforce a specific identity of the City.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".