Comparative the Diurnal changes in the Cognitive abilities of Patients with Parkinson's disease, from Morning to Afternoon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Parkinson’s Diseases is primarily caused by damage of dopaminergic neurons in the nigrostriatal pathway and accumulation of aggregated a-snucleui in specific brain stem, spinal cord, and cortical region.The loss of dopamine is predominantly severe in the putamen, which explains the motor manifestations of the disease; other dopaminergic projections are also affected and contribute to the development of cognitive impairment. Cognitive dysfunction is common in Parkinson’s disease and predicts poor clinical outcomes. It is associated primarily with pathologic involvement of basal forebrain cholinergic and prefrontal dopaminergic systems. Impairments in executive functions, attention, and visuospatial abilities are its hallmark features with eventual involvement of memory and other domains. Aim: Compare the diurnal changes in cognitive abilities of patients with Parkinson's Disease over morning versus evening Methodology: Patients were selected for this study in the sample size of 30. The Mean age group of Parkinson’s patients lie in between 60- 70 year. Random sampling was done, Collection of Data from SAM global University, Bilkheriya. In the inclusion criteria MMSE Score is equal to 25, well understand the Hindi and English language, with having normal hearing capacity. In the exclusion criteria patient with wheel chair excluded and having Severe cognitive impairments or presence of any psychiatric impairments Result: Difference in cognition on the total score of PDCRS between Morning to Evening.(<0.05).There was considerable cognitive decline seen as the day wears out Conclusions: Diurnal variation present in the subjects with Parkinson's disease seeing that there were significant variations in the scores of the patients on the cognitive rating scale from morning to evening.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".