MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387706677 · doi:10.33137/rr.v46i1.41738

Les unitariens et le pouvoir princier en Transylvanie (années 1560–années 1630)

2023· article· fr· W4387706677 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dénes Harai

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCentral European and Russian historical studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jean-Sigismond Szapolyai (1540–71), dit Jean II, premier prince de Transylvanie (1570–71) après avoir été roi élu de Hongrie, était fortement influencé par le tandem unitarien Giorgio Biandrata-François Dávid dans les dernières années de sa vie. En 1571, l’unitarisme est même devenu la quatrième religion possédant un droit de cité plein et entier en Transylvanie, ce qui lui valait une égalité devant la loi avec le catholicisme, le luthéranisme et le calvinisme. Même si les successeurs de Jean II étaient catholiques dans les trois dernières décennies du xvie siècle puis calvinistes au xviie siècle, les unitariens ont prospéré jusqu’aux années 1580, possédant et maintenant une grande influence dans la principauté jusqu’aux années 1630. Cet article fait le point sur l’implication de cette communauté dans la vie politique et diplomatique transylvaine de la Renaissance pour en étudier les représentations et les perceptions en lien avec le pouvoir princier dans la zone d’affrontement de la République chrétienne et de l’Empire ottoman au temps des guerres de Religion européennes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.107

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicCentral European and Russian historical studiesFrench-language works237,207