MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4387708308 · doi:10.1101/2023.10.13.562197

Combined studies of N170/M170 responses to single letters and pseudoletters

2023· preprint· en· W4387708308 on OpenAlexafffund
Nima Toussi, Osamu Takai, Sewon Bann, Jacob Rowe, Andrew-John I. Hildebrand, Anthony T. Herdman

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSimon Fraser UniversityMichael Smith Health Research BC
KeywordsLateralization of brain functionElectroencephalographyPsychologyTask (project management)Cognitive psychologyPerceptionEvent-related potentialMagnetoencephalographySpeech recognitionAudiologyComputer scienceNeuroscienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT To read efficiently, individuals must be able to rapidly identify letters within their visual networks, which occurs through forming line segments into letters and then letters into words. The temporal processes and utilized brain areas that engage in this process are widely thought to be left-lateralized within the brain. However, a range of studies demonstrate that the processing of unfamiliar stimuli, such as pseudoletters, is temporally delayed and bilaterally processed when compared to letters. The present study investigated the contributions of both hemispheres and how these interactions impact the temporal dynamics of implicit visual processing of single-letters as compared to unfamiliar pseudoletters (false fonts). The results of 5 “in-house” studies are presented within a meta-analysis (synthesis analysis), 3 High-density EEG studies and 2 MEG studies. Of the 3 EEG studies, 2 focused on measuring event related potentials (ERPs) while the participants performed an orthographic discrimination task (letters vs pseudoletters) and the other was a target detection task in which the participants detected infrequent, simple perceptual targets within a series of pseudoletter and letter strings. Of the 2 MEG studies, one was a discrimination task and the other a target detection task. Delayed N170 waveforms to pseudoletters as compared to letters were exhibited across all studies. Lateralization of the ERP differences between letter-evoked and pseudoletter-evoked responses were bilaterally distributed, whereas lateralization measure separately for letters and pseudoletters were primarily left-lateralized. As a whole, these in-house studies indicate that ERPs to letters occur earlier than to pseudoletters, and that interpretation of hemispheric laterality depends on whether the researcher is assessing ERP differences between letters and pseudoletters or the ERP waveforms of the separate letter and pseudoletter conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies→French-language works237,207→