MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387709215 · doi:10.2118/212430-pa

Vaca Muerta: Improved Fracture Width Distribution and Classification of Natural Fracture Widths Based on Outcrops, Cores, and Microresistivity Images Data

2023· article· en· W4387709215 on OpenAlexaff
Rahimah Abd Karim, Roberto Aguilera, Gustavo Flores Montilla, Hector Biglia

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFracture (geology)GeologyOutcropOil shaleMineralogyDistribution (mathematics)Geotechnical engineeringMathematicsGeomorphologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Natural fractures in Vaca Muerta are very complex, such that their fracture width distributions cannot be analyzed simply by considering normal, log-normal, or log-log distributions. Natural fractures are commonly classified as macrofractures or microfractures; however, no consistent fracture width is attached to those fractures. In this study, two new approaches are proposed; an improved fracture width distribution and a classification for natural fractures that encompasses all physical widths found in petroleum reservoirs. The method developed in this study first evaluates the distribution of natural fracture widths from outcrops, cores, and microresistivity images of Vaca Muerta shale. An improved fracture width distribution is established through a variable shape distribution (VSD). The model provides a good fit, even if the shape of the distribution deviates from generally accepted distributions. This improves the accuracy of fracture width and intensity prediction, which is useful in generating synthetic production logging tools (PLTs) to estimate productivity from fractured intervals. Subsequently, a consistent classification for natural fractures is introduced to cover all fracture widths found in petroleum reservoirs. Results indicate that fracture widths in Vaca Muerta shale range between 0.0003 mm and 7 mm for outcrops, 0.0003 mm and 2 mm for cores, and 0.01 mm and 2 mm for microresistivity images. The VSD model provides a good fit of fracture widths from the three sources, without truncating any of the data. Truncation of data is usually required when using generally accepted distributions. With this improved distribution, size pattern extrapolation can be performed with greater accuracy. The physical widths can also be translated into hydraulic apertures to generate theoretical PLT. This is useful for estimating relative petroleum production potential from each fractured interval and for identifying future refracturing zones. Additionally, the study gives origin to a consistent classification of fracture widths that has application in Vaca Muerta and other oil and gas reservoirs. Five subclasses are introduced, which are megafractures (> 10 mm), macrofractures (1–10 mm), mesofractures (0.1–1 mm), microfractures (0.01–0.1 mm), and nanofractures (<0.01 mm). A careful review of the literature indicates that there is ambivalence as it is hard to find a clear and precise terminology that encompasses the entire range of fracture widths. The proposed classification eliminates that difficulty. In this paper, for the first time, a consistent fracture width classification is developed that encompasses the whole spectrum of widths found in petroleum reservoirs. It has wide application in Vaca Muerta, where widths, derived from outcrops, cores, and microresistivity image data are matched with a VSD model. Furthermore, the proposed classification can be used in other oil and gas reservoirs, thus eliminating the fracture width ambivalence found many times in the geoscience and petroleum engineering literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.445
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE JournalSame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207