MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Geology, geochronology, geochemistry and Hf-Sr-Nd isotopes of the ‘green-bean rocks’ (felsic tuffs) in the western Yangtze Block, China: Implications for genesis and enrichment mechanism of Li

2023· article· en· W4387709779 on OpenAlexaff
Bing Zhang, Mingshi Feng, Yiwei Peng, Kai Yang, Yan Zhang, Siyu Wen, Xiaoyang Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueOre Geology Reviews · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFelsicGeologyZirconGeochemistryVolcanic rockGeochronologyVolcano

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The widespread ‘green-bean rocks’ (GBRs) in the western Yangtze Block (YZB) are traditionally considered to be originally felsic volcanic tuff. These greenish or yellowish green GBRs are characterized by the presence of bean-like grains. Although the GBRs are enriched in Li in addition to K, the enrichment mechanism of Li during the formation process of GBRs remains controversial. Detailed petrography, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, whole-rock geochemistry, U-Pb dating and Hf-Sr-Nd isotopes have been conducted on the GBRs from the Longmendong section in the western YZB to shed light on the genesis of GBRs, Li enrichment mechanism, and further exploration. The zircon and apatite from Longmendong GBRs yielded U-Pb ages of 247.2 ± 0.6 Ma and 247.0 ± 11.0 Ma, respectively. Longmendong GBRs show bull-rock (87Sr/86Sr)i ratios ranging from 0.72602 to 0.72948 and εNd(t) values between −9.8 and −10.4. Zircons have low εHf(t) values and old two-stage Hf model ages (TDM2) ranging from −16.1 to −7.4 and 1741 to 2285 Ma, respectively. Apatite grains display high (87Sr/86Sr)i ratios and low εNd(t) values in the range of 0.72225–0.72461 and −9.93–−11.18, respectively. The combined evidence from textures, mineral compositions, whole-rock geochemistry and Sr-Nd-Hf isotopic compositions indicates that the GBRs originated from felsic volcanic ashes that erupted along the Sanjiang Orogen. The magma of volcanic ashes was sourced from the remelting of ancient crust in response to the initial collision of Indochina-Yangtze Blocks during the closure of the eastern Paleo-Tethys Ocean. The apatite grains separated from GBRs show significantly low Sr and Eu contents (136–223 ppm and 4.23–6.53 ppm, respectively) and low (La/Sm)N (0.97–1.11) and (Sm/Yb)N (3.49–4.56) ratios, indicating that apatite crystallized earlier than the plagioclase and the original magma are highly evolved. The magma of GBRs originated from ancient crust with significant differentiation, facilitating the initial enrichment of Li during the magma evolution. On the other hand, the GBRs have elevated levels of K2O, MgO and clay minerals (e.g., illite and illite/smectite mixed layer minerals), which are proportional to the Li concentrations. This suggests that Li in the GBRs is adsorbed by clay minerals in ionic form and experience additional enrichment during the transformation from volcanic ashes into clay minerals. Furthermore, the GBRs in the northeastern Sichuan basin under a limited sedimentary environment have relatively higher Li concentrations, suggesting that continuous evaporation also positively contributed to Li enrichment in GBRs. Geographically, GBRs in the Sichuan basin are closely related to underground Li-rich brines hosted within the adjacent strata. Therefore, the widespread Li-rich GBRs in the western YZB not only hold promise as a potential Li resource, but also serve as a marker layer for the prospecting Li brines in the Sichuan basin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.139

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOre Geology ReviewsSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207