MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387715787 · doi:10.18254/s207054760027906-3

Law 96 and language reform in Quebec

2023· article· en· W4387715787 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ekaterina Isaeva

Bibliographic record

VenueRussia and America in the 21st Century · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLinguistic and Sociocultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCharterGovernment (linguistics)Political scienceLanguage policyLawOrder (exchange)Public administrationSociologyLinguisticsBusinessPedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The major reforms that took place in Québec society during the Quiet Revolution of the 1960s led to fundamental changes in the functioning of the French language, especially in the fields of education, production, administration and others. In order to protect the status of the French language and the language rights of residents of the province, the Québec government has adopted a number of language laws, the most important of which is the Charter of the French Language (1977). Law 96 of 2022 on the French language in Québec makes important changes to the provisions of the Charter relating to the province's language policy. The article presents an analysis of the main provisions of Law 96 and gives an overview of the social areas of Québec on which the new Language law will have the greatest impact.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.487
Threshold uncertainty score0.963

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussia and America in the 21st CenturySame topicLinguistic and Sociocultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207