Russia and Canada in the Arctic against the backdrop of the Ukraine crisis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article analyzes Russian-Canadian relations in the Arctic in the period from 2014 to 2022. Cooperation in the Arctic and the North was considered a priority area of Russian-Canadian relations in 2014-2021. However, it was repeatedly noted that despite the significant potential for interaction, there are risks due to growing negative trends in other spheres of bilateral relations and against the background of a general crisis in relations between Russia and the West. These concerns have met the reality. In the period of the Russian Presidency of the Arctic Council (2021-2023), political changes beyond the Arctic agenda took place, and marked a turning point for the Arctic Council, international cooperation in the Arctic, Russian-Canadian relations in the region. Against the background of the deepening of the Ukrainian crisis, the Arctic Council has suspended its full-scale activities, many formats of multilateral cooperation with the participation of Russia were ceased. The results of previous years of investment and economic interaction between Russia and Canada were “cancelled”, the rethinking the security issues in the Arctic region is in process. These trends influence the future nature of Russia-Canada relations in the Arctic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".