MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387717444 · doi:10.1109/tmc.2023.3325301

Bayesian Meta-Learning for Adaptive Traffic Prediction in Wireless Networks

2023· article· en· W4387717444 on OpenAlexaff
Zihuan Wang, Vincent W. S. Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceProbabilistic logicMean squared errorData miningInferenceMachine learningArtificial intelligenceWirelessWireless networkBaseline (sea)Statistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wireless traffic prediction is indispensable for network planning and resource management. Due to different population distributions and user behavior, there exist strong spatial-temporal variations in wireless traffic across different regions. Most of the conventional traffic prediction approaches can only tackle a particular spatial-temporal pattern and cannot capture such variations in wireless traffic. This motivates us to develop an adaptive approach which can tackle spatial-temporal variations and predict wireless traffic in different regions. In this paper, we formulate an adaptive traffic prediction problem from a probabilistic inference perspective and develop a variational spatial-temporal Bayesian meta-learning (VST-BML) algorithm. We model the traffic prediction in different regions as different prediction tasks. The proposed VST-BML algorithm can learn the common spatial-temporal features shared by all prediction tasks, and adaptively infer the task-specific parameters to tackle spatial-temporal variations. We evaluate the performance of our proposed VST-BML algorithm using a real-world traffic dataset. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm can quickly adapt to different prediction tasks by using only a small number of data samples and provide accurate traffic prediction in different regions. When compared with five baseline methods, the proposed algorithm can reduce the root- mean-square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) by 53.0% and 48.4%, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.920

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Mobile ComputingSame topicTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207