MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387718340 · doi:10.3997/2214-4609.202321042

Subsurface Energy Transition Projects in Nova Scotia: Government-University-Industry Collaborations and Eage Student Competitions

2023· article· en· W4387718340 on OpenAlexaffabout
Frank Richards, Hongyi Cen, Grant Wach, A MacDonald, Fraser Keppie, Natasha MacAdam, T. Kelly, Christopher Sangster, K. Doane, K.L. Kendell, Mark E. Deptuck, R. Dmytriw, Maurice B. Dusseault, C. Skinner, Thomas Finkbeiner, Annelies Kamp, K. Labat, Robin D. Clark, G. Bernasconi, Phuong‐Thu Trinh, A. Hardwick, C. Guerra, C. Steiner-Luckabauer, P. Lys

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Canadian institutionsOffshore Energy Research Association of Nova ScotiaGeological Survey of CanadaUniversity of WaterlooPetroleum Research Newfoundland and LabradorDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaGeothermal energyGeothermal gradientRenewable energyGovernment (linguistics)Submarine pipelineEngineeringOceanographyGeologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Energy transition projects at Dalhousie University and the Nova Scotia DNRR (Department of Natural Resources and Renewables) have benefited from collaborations between industry, academia, and government. Regional studies and screening studies by ExxonMobil, GSC, DNRR, CNSOPB and OERA provided foundations for recent EAGE student competitions that have added innovation and multiple full-cycle realisations (geoscience-engineering-economics-HSE). Since 2021 ∼60 multi-disciplinary teams have participated in three Minus CO2 Challenges tackling complex offshore and onshore Nova Scotia projects. The 2021 competition ( First Break, April 2022 ) provided the first published quantitative assessment of carbon storage in deep saline aquifers on the Mesozoic Scotian Shelf demonstrating volumes similar to the North Sea. The 2022 competition ( First Break, June 2023 ) focussed on risking and success-case carbon-neutral development of light-oil prospects at Penobscot near Sable Island. In 2023, teams were charged with developing 300 MW of renewable energy, balancing load with CAES or hydrogen storage in Carboniferous salt caverns in the onshore Cumberland Basin. Modelling of geothermal energy in Cumberland Basin reflects the 2023 Laurie Dake Challenge (geothermal evaluation in the Vienna Basin, courtesy OMV).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.384
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsFrench-language works237,207