MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387718743 · doi:10.18254/s207054760027911-9

At the dawn of multiculturalism: the 50th anniversary of publishing Margaret Atwood’s “Survival”

2023· article· en· W4387718743 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
O. A. Fedosyuk

Bibliographic record

VenueRussia and America in the 21st Century · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulticulturalismPublishingImmigrationHistoryPublic figureMedia studiesCanadian literatureSociologyClassicsArt historyLiteraturePolitical scienceLawArtArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1972, Margaret Atwood published her book “Survival: A Thematic Guide to Canadian Literature”. Using a big number of facts, Atwood made a deep insight into the history of both English and French-Canadian literatures, compared them with American and European literary traditions as well as based her observations on an original concept, thus creating an invaluable introduction to Canadian literature for a wider public. In this article, we are going to give a brief review of the book which is practically unknown in Russia, focusing on the way Atwood interpreted such multicultural and quite little-known then issues as images of the First Nations and immigrants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.586
Threshold uncertainty score0.897

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussia and America in the 21st CenturySame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207