La diversidad y los usos mixtos en los entornos culturales y creativos como impulsores de la participación ciudadana y la sostenibilidad: análisis del St. George’s Cultural Quarter (Leicester, Reino Unido)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cultural and creative urban areas are fundamental in our cities for cultural development and the promotion of creativity in the city. This research aims to examine the importance of diversity and mixed uses in these areas, focusing on the case study of the St. George’s Cultural Quarter in Leicester, United Kingdom. It highlights how the combination of different cultural and creative activities, together with the diversity of actors involved in them, contributes to the promotion of citizen participation and the revitalisation of an area. Through a detailed analysis of this case study, successful strategies to promote social cohesion and sustainability in cultural and creative urban areas are identified. To do this, this research presents different activities developed by spaces in the St. George’s Cultural Quarter such as the LCB Depot, Leicester Print Workshop, the Curve Theatre, the Phoenix Digital Media Center and the Chutney Ivy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".