MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387722567 · doi:10.1061/jsendh.steng-11748

A Crowdsensing-Based Framework for Indirect Bridge Monitoring Using Mel-Frequency Cepstral Analysis Considering Elimination of Operational Effects

2023· article· en· W4387722567 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Structural Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Health Monitoring Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)Computer scienceMel-frequency cepstrumReal-time computingProcess (computing)AccelerationEngineeringArtificial intelligenceFeature extraction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper puts forward an indirect bridge monitoring method using Mel-frequency cepstral analysis of inverse-filtered drive-by acceleration signals collected through smartphones. Crowdsensing-based approaches using data collected by smart cars and smartphones opened a new chapter in bridge monitoring by reducing the costs and increasing the efficiency of the bridge monitoring process. However, the major challenge of the dominancy of the operational effects in the recorded drive-by vibrations overshadows the bridge monitoring objective. This paper proposes an inverse filtering-based monitoring approach to suppress operational effects. The inverse-filtered spectrum is later employed in a Mel-frequency cepstral analysis, leading to the calculation of the abnormality index, which is then used to detect the change in the bridge state. The performance of the proposed method in suppressing operational effects is assessed through a series of laboratory and real-life experiments. Afterward, the damage detection capability of the method is investigated for two damage levels at different locations along the bridge, modeled in a laboratory environment. The results provide evidence for the capability of the proposed method in drive-by damage detection of bridges. Moreover, using the smartphone as the data acquisition device paves the path toward the implementation of the method for crowdsensing-based bridge monitoring in future smart cities, although more operational factors such as passenger interactions and resulting smartphone motions need to be considered in future studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.410
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it