MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387737547 · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c02142

Self-Assemblies of Isomeric Copper Iodide Trimers with Geometry-Dependent Photophysical Properties

2023· article· en· W4387737547 on OpenAlexaff
Linyuan Lian, Peng Zhang, Jianbo Gao, Daoli Zhang, Jianbing Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry of Materials · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPerovskite Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersBasic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaScience, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen MunicipalityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsIodideCopperHalideLuminescenceChemistryMetal halidesCrystallographyPhotochemistryDensity functional theoryCrystal structureInorganic chemistryMaterials scienceComputational chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Zero-dimensional (0D) metal halides have attracted great research interest for the past few years due to their fascinating photophysical properties and extraordinary structural diversity. However, controlled synthesis of these metal halides in a rational way remains a big challenge, and the basic relationship between their crystal structures and photophysical properties is still not well understood. In this work, two new 0D self-assemblies of isomeric copper iodide trimers with the same formula of (BTMA) 3 Cu 3 I 6 (BTMA = benzyltrimethylammonium) but different crystal structures were synthesized. Interestingly, we found that the photophysical properties of these copper iodide isomers depend strongly on the geometries of their copper iodide trimers, i.e., one isomer with boat-shaped [Cu 3 I 6 ] 3– trimers ( T1 ) exhibits yellow emission centered at 606 nm at room temperature, while the other isomer with crown-shaped [Cu 3 I 6 ] 3– trimers ( T2 ) shows orange emission centered at 639 nm. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations revealed that both the organic cations and inorganic copper iodide trimers participate in the luminescence process of these copper iodide isomers, and a through-space charge transfer (TSCT) between the spatially separated organic ligands and inorganic [Cu 3 I 6 ] 3– trimers would occur during the optical emission/absorption, which is quite different from the luminescence mechanism proposed for the previously reported 0D ionic copper halides.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry of MaterialsSame topicPerovskite Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207