Modeling of diesel particulate filter temperature dynamics during exotherm using neural networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF) in the diesel engine exhaust stream needs frequent regeneration (exotherm) to remove captured particulate matter (PM, or soot) without damaging to the porous DPF structure by controlling the peak temperatures and temperature gradients across the DPF. In this study, temperature distribution in a DPF is measured at 42 strategic locations in the test DPF under various regeneration conditions of exhaust flow rates, regeneration temperatures and soot loads. Then a data-based model with feed-forward neural network architecture is designed to model the thermal gradients and temperature dynamics of the DPF during the regeneration process. The neural network feature vector selection, network architecture, hyperparameter calibration process, measured data preprocessing, and experimental data acquisition procedure are evaluated. Over 7,400 experimental data points at various regeneration temperatures, flow rates and soot loads are used in training and validating the neural network model. It is found that the neural network model can accurately predict the 42 DPF bed temperatures simultaneously at different locations, and the time series analysis of both model-predicted and experimentally measured temperatures shows a good correlation. This indicates that the currently developed neural network model can provide spatial distribution of temperature in the DPF, and comprehend the nonlinearity of the temperature dynamics due to DPF soot load at exothermic conditions. These results demonstrate that the data-based model has capability in predicting thermal gradients within a DPF, aiding in determining a safer DPF regeneration strategy, onboard diagnostics and DPF development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".