MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387743566 · doi:10.3390/s23208541

A Real-Time Inspection System for Industrial Helical Gears

2023· article· en· W4387743566 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsVisual inspectionAutomotive industryAutomated optical inspectionProcess (computing)Inspection timeAutomated X-ray inspectionComputer scienceEngineeringMachine visionWork (physics)Engineering drawingAutomotive engineeringArtificial intelligenceMechanical engineeringImage processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Manufacturing is an imperfect process that requires frequent checks and verifications to ensure products are being produced properly. In many cases, such as visual inspection, these checks can be automated to a certain degree. Incorporating advanced inspection techniques (i.e., via deep learning) into real-world inspection pipelines requires different mechanical, machine vision, and process-level considerations. In this work, we present an approach that builds upon prior work at an automotive gear facility located in Guelph, Ontario, which is looking to expand its defect detection capabilities. We outline a set of inspection-cell changes, which has led to full-gear surface scanning and inspection at a rate of every 7.5 s, and which is currently able to detect three common types of surface-level defects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.670
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it