MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387745929 · doi:10.1016/j.ekir.2023.10.007

Breast Cancer Screening, Incidence, and Mortality in Women Treated With Maintenance Dialysis: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Ontario, Canada

2023· article· en· W4387745929 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Nida Saleem, Danielle M. Nash, Eric Au, Bin Luo, Jonathan C. Craig, Amit Garg, Eric McArthur, Stephanie N. Dixon, Armando Teixeira‐Pinto, Wai H. Lim, Germaine Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueKidney International Reports · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening
Canadian institutionsLawson Health Research InstituteWestern University
FundersOntario Ministry of Health and Long-Term CareInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
KeywordsMedicineIncidence (geometry)CancerInternal medicinePopulationKidney cancerKidney diseaseCancer registryDialysisColorectal cancerMultiple myelomaCohortOncologyLung cancerStandardized mortality ratioBreast cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cancer and cancer-related mortality incidence is approximately 1.5 times higher in patients with kidney failure compared to the age and sex-matched general population. The increased incidence is dependent on the type of cancer.1 For example, for cancers known to cause kidney dysfunction, such as urinary tract cancer and multiple myeloma, the risk is almost 10 times higher in patients with kidney failure compared to the general population, whereas the incidence of lung cancer, colorectal cancer, and Kaposi’s sarcoma is 2 to 3 times higher among patients with chronic kidney disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.201

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKidney International ReportsSame topicGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningFrench-language works237,207