MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

S862 Real-World Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab in Bio-Naïve Patients With Early Crohn’s Disease: Results From the EVOLVE Expansion Study

2023· article· en· W4387751226 on OpenAlexaff
Britt Christensen, Michael Scharl, Brian Bressler, Zaeem Khan, Yuliya Halchenko, Pravin Kamble, Shashi Adsul, Zeinab Farhat, Marc Ferrante

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsThermo Fisher Scientific (Canada)St. Paul's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVedolizumabDiscontinuationUstekinumabInternal medicineAdverse effectHazard ratioSurgeryCrohn's diseaseDiseaseInfliximabConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: There is limited data comparing real-world clinical effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab (VDZ) and ustekinumab (UST) in patients (pts) with early Crohn’s Disease (CD, with a disease duration ≤2 years). Methods: EVOLVE Expansion (NCT05056441) was a multicenter, observational, retrospective medical chart review study in biologic-naïve pts with CD (≥18 years old) who initiated VDZ or UST treatment in Australia, Belgium, or Switzerland from 2016 to 2021. This analysis looked at treatment outcomes in patients with early treatment (disease duration ≤2 years) who initiated VDZ or UST as first-line biologic. Data were collected from treatment initiation to chart abstraction, treatment discontinuation, death, or loss to follow-up. Cumulative rates of clinical response, remission, mucosal healing, and treatment persistence were estimated using the Kaplan Meier method over 12, 24 and 36 months. Serious adverse events (SAEs), serious infections (SIs), CD exacerbations, and CD-related hospitalization and surgeries were also evaluated. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics across treatment groups were balanced using inverse probability weighting (IPW). Results: There were 141 VDZ and 108 UST pts with early treatment. After IPW, both groups had similar baseline characteristics (Table 1). Over 36 months, cumulative rates were similar between VDZ- and UST-treated pts for clinical response (VDZ 80.8%, UST 79.0%; P=0.52) and clinical remission (VDZ 85.3%, UST 82.8%; P=0.52). Mucosal healing rates were significantly higher in VDZ- vs UST-treated pts (VDZ 92.5%, UST 87.0%, P=0.02). Treatment persistence (VDZ 64.6%, UST 76.7%; P=0.57) was not significantly different over 36 months. There were no significant differences in the risk of safety outcomes: SAEs (hazard ratio [HR]=1.23; CI 0.56-2.72; P=0.60), SIs (HR=6.57; CI 0.44-98.04; P=0.17), CD exacerbations (HR=1.07; CI 0.65-1.75; P=0.79), CD-related surgeries (HR=0.82; CI 0.38-1.76; P=0.61) or CD-related hospitalizations (HR=0.83; CI 0.35-1.95; P=0.67). Conclusion: In CD pts with early initiation of biologic treatment, rates of mucosal healing were significantly greater with VDZ vs UST. There were no significant differences between the VDZ and UST cohorts in clinical remission, clinical response, or treatment persistence. The probability of mucosal healing was significantly greater in pts treated with VDZ. The risk of CD-related hospitalization, surgeries, SAEs and SIs was similar between cohorts. Table 1. - Baseline Characteristics Unweighted Weighted Baseline Characteristics VDZN=141 USTN=108 P-value VDZN=126 USTN=123 Std Diff after IPW Age (years), mean ± SD 44.5±19.1 39.9±18.5 0.0567 42.9±18.5 43.0±19.0 0.0035 Male, n (%) 72 (51.1) 54 (50.0) 0.8678 66 (52.3) 61 (49.4) 0.0595 Disease duration (years), median (min, max) 0.5 (0.0, 2.0) 0.5 (0.0, 1.9) 0.7667 0.5 (0, 2.0) 0.4 (0, 1.9) 0.0501 CD location 0.0152 Colonic with/without upper GI disease, n (%) 28 (19.9) 11 (10.2) 21 (17.0) 13 (10.9) 0.0807 Ileal with/without upper GI disease, n (%) 71 (50.4) 60 (55.6) 69 (55.2) 64 (52.1) 0.0585 Ileocolonic with/without upper GI disease, n (%) 34 (24.1) 37 (34.3) 33 (26.3) 44 (35.6) 0.1115 Disease behavior 0.3313 0.0976 Non-stricturing, non-penetrating, n (%) 104 (73.8) 70 (64.8) 99 (78.7) 88 (71.7) Penetrating, n (%) 10 (7.1) 8 (7.4) 9 (7.0) 7 (6.0) Stricturing, n (%) 19 (13.5) 24 (22.2) 15 (11.8) 22 (17.7) Disease severity 0.0384 Normal, n (%) 10 (7.1) 10 (9.3) 9 (7.3) 13 (10.5) Mild, n (%) 40 (28.4) 13 (12.0) 40 (31.4) 17 (13.4) 0.1347 Moderate, n (%) 64 (45.4) 62 (57.4) 54 (43.0) 66 (53.2) 0.0885 Severe, n (%) 17 (12.1) 13 (12.0) 16 (12.4) 16 (12.7) 0.0914 Active fistula* at index Yes, n (%) 11 (7.8) 5 (4.6) 0.3118 8 (6.2) 6 (5.0) 0.0109 Prior CD-related surgeries before treatment initiation Yes, n (%) 18 (12.8) 11 (10.2) 0.5292 13 (10.3) 12 (9.9) 0.0525 CD-related hospitalizations in previous 12 months Yes, n (%) 30 (21.3) 24 (22.2) 0.8576 27 (21.3) 25 (20.1) 0.0120 *Includes enterocutaneous, perianal, rectovaginal, other, and unknown. CD, Crohn’s disease; GI, gastrointestinal; IPW, inverse probability weighting; NA, not available; Std Diff, standardized difference; UST, ustekinumab, VDZ, vedolizumab.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→