MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

S1157 Geographic Hot Spot Analysis of a Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease Registry in British Columbia

2023· article· en· W4387751777 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mielle Michaux, Justin M. Chan, Kevan Jacobson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIncidence (geometry)Inflammatory bowel diseasePopulationDemographyUlcerative colitisPediatricsDiseaseEnvironmental healthInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: High and increasing incidence of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Canada presents a considerable challenge to both patient wellness and the healthcare system. One of the most notable populations at risk in the province of British Columbia (BC) is people of South Asian (SA) descent. Geographic hot spot analysis can be used to statistically identify areas of high incidence to direct service delivery and target for followup studies. Methods: This study used data from a clinical registry of patients seen at BC Children’s Hospital and diagnosed before age 17 during the period of 2003 - 2016 in the Vancouver Coastal or Fraser Health Authorities. Cases were directly age-standardized for small Community Health Services Areas (CHSAs) using 2011 BC population as the reference population. Standardized incidence ratios were adaptively smoothed toward regional averages to adjust for areas with small populations. The local Moran’s I statistic was used to locate IBD, Crohn’s disease (CD), and ulcerative colitis (UC) hot spots (relatively high incidence), while the bivariate local Moran’s I was used to determine the location of shared UC and CD clusters. Monte Carlo simulation with a Holm correction was used to approximate statistical significance. This study was approved by the UBC Children's and Women's Research Ethics Board. Results: Within the Greater Vancouver area [Figure 1A], hot spots of relatively high incidence [Figure 1B] were identified for IBD, CD, and UC, with shared hot spot clusters of CD and UC. We observed differential SA population distribution [Figure 1C] across the study area and identified hot spots. Geographical variations in IBD subtype were observed, with a univariate spatial outlier of relatively low incidence UC surrounded by high incidence UC [Figure 1D] and a bivariate spatial outlier of high UC surrounded by low CD [Figure 1D]. Conclusion: Geospatial hot spot analysis is a valuable tool for quantifying geographic patterns of pediatric IBD. Identified geographic hot spots were often located in areas with large SA populations who we have previously identified as a population at risk of developing IBD. However, not all areas with a high proportion of SA residents were part of identified hot spots. Environmental determinants are likely extremely important for further understanding this differential expression of disease in areas with large SA populations. Studies to investigate environmental determinants of IBD in BC are underway.Figure 1.: A) Greater Vancouver population density reference map. Darker color indicates higher population density. B) Identified hot spots of relatively high incidence for IBD, CD, and UC. Darker color indicates hot spots identified in multiple analyses. C) South Asian ethnic origin of the population. Percentages are categorized into intervals spanning 10%, with the palest green color representing 0 - 10% South Asian population and the darkest green color representing 60 - 70%. D) Identified spatial outliers (low UC surrounded by high UC and high UC surrounded by low CD).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.013
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→