MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387753726 · doi:10.1159/000532108

Atypical Central Retinal Artery Occlusion following COVID-19 Infection: A Case Report

2023· article· en· W4387753726 on OpenAlexaff
Hamid Reza Heidarzadeh, Mojtaba Abrishami, Mehrdad Motamed Shariati, Seyed Hossein Ghavami Shahri, Mohammad Reza Ansari Astaneh

Bibliographic record

VenueCase Reports in Ophthalmology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal and Optic Conditions
Canadian institutionsOccupational Cancer Research Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCentral retinal artery occlusionOphthalmologyVisual acuityCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)SurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Herein, we report a patient with atypical central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) following COVID-19 recovery. A 44-year-old male was referred to the emergency room with a history of diplopia and sudden-onset painless visual loss in his left eye. He had a history of 1-week hospitalization for severe COVID-19 infection with pneumonia 3 weeks before, with positive real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction result for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in a nasopharyngeal sample. His visual acuity in the left eye was light perception which became no light perception later. Relative afferent pupillary defect was positive in the left eye. He had anterior chamber and anterior vitreous cells due to spillover and white cotton-wool-like patches in the left eye. He was diagnosed with atypical CRAO with uveitis-like features. After 3 weeks, he developed neovascular glaucoma and was treated with panretinal photocoagulation. In conclusion, SARS-CoV-2-induced vasculopathy and hypercoagulopathy conditions may be involved in the progression of CRAO in our patient. COVID-19 could be a considerable predisposing factor for CRAO.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCase Reports in OphthalmologySame topicRetinal and Optic ConditionsFrench-language works237,207