MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387756349 · doi:10.23977/aetp.2023.071320

Theoretical Construction of Educational Leadership Discipline from the Perspective of Research Based Learning

2023· article· en· W4387756349 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yang Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Educational Technology and Psychology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTechnology-Enhanced Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEducational leadershipPerspective (graphical)Engineering ethicsLeadership studiesEducational researchNeuroleadershipSociologyPedagogyKnowledge managementLeadership stylePolitical sciencePublic relationsComputer scienceEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of research-based learning has put forward new requirements for the theoretical construction of educational leadership discipline. The theoretical construction of educational leadership discipline should be based on research-based learning, and new adjustments and innovations should be made in research methods, research paradigms, and other aspects. The current theoretical construction of educational leadership should focus on "research-based learning", attach importance to the intersection and integration with other related disciplines, and continuously enrich and develop the theory of educational leadership. This article mainly introduces the connotations of research-based learning and educational leadership, and then analyzes the impact of research-based learning on educational leadership. Finally, relevant suggestions for the theoretical construction of educational leadership discipline are proposed, hoping to provide reference and assistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.541
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.015
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.503
Teacher spread0.424 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Educational Technology and PsychologySame topicTechnology-Enhanced Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207