An Approach of Improved Traversal Merging of Transaction Data for Faster Apriori Algorithm
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to improve the operational efficiency of the Apriori algorithm in the data preprocessing stage of large-scale data and achieve overall optimization of the Apriori project, a fast traversal merge pre-processing method is proposed by integrating an adaptive association mining threshold determination method. Firstly, the proposed fast traversal merging method is analyzed and compared with two benchmark algorithms, and the experimental results show that the running time of the fast traversal merging method is much lower than that of the two benchmark methods; secondly, according to the central limit theorem, a data adaptive support threshold setting method is proposed, which can avoid the subjectivity of the minimum support threshold setting in association mining; finally, the two proposed algorithms are applied to Apriori and the results show that the application of the proposed improved method for association mining gives significantly better results than association mining under the better processing of the benchmark algorithm, and thus can significantly improve the efficiency of solving the shopping basket problem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it