MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387763031 · doi:10.1061/jhend8.hyeng-13493

Surge Analysis of Air Vessel with Different Connection Types in Pressurized Water Delivery Systems

2023· article· en· W4387763031 on OpenAlexaff
Xuyun Chen, Jian Zhang, David Z. Zhu, Xiaodong Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hydraulic Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSurgeConnection (principal bundle)Environmental scienceHydraulicsMarine engineeringHydrology (agriculture)Geotechnical engineeringEngineeringCivil engineeringGeologyMechanical engineeringElectrical engineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Air vessels have been commonly applied to prevent water hammer related to pump operations, but their connection types and effects have rarely been discussed. In this study, surge analysis of air vessels with three different connection types was conducted using the perturbation method. The coefficients of impedance and friction were introduced to the influence of the type of connection on the transient conditions in the vessel and the pipe. A mathematical model of the double-connecting pipe air vessel (DCP-AV) was established based on the method of characteristics (MOC). The hydraulic transient simulation of a practical water delivery project was then conducted to verify the accuracy of the analysis. The results showed that the theoretical analysis, Runge-Kutta method, and numerical simulation were in good agreement. Additionally, the DCP-AV combined with a one-way valve was found to considerably reduce the maximum water level in the vessel, and reduce the maximum pressure of the pipeline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hydraulic EngineeringSame topicWater Systems and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207