Leveraging Tissue-Specific Enhancer–Target Gene Regulatory Networks Identifies Enhancer Somatic Mutations That Functionally Impact Lung Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Enhancers are noncoding regulatory DNA regions that modulate the transcription of target genes, often over large distances along with the genomic sequence. Enhancer alterations have been associated with various pathological conditions, including cancer. However, the identification and characterization of somatic mutations in noncoding regulatory regions with a functional effect on tumorigenesis and prognosis remain a major challenge. Here, we present a strategy for detecting and characterizing enhancer mutations in a genome-wide analysis of patient cohorts, across three lung cancer subtypes. Lung tissue-specific enhancers were defined by integrating experimental data and public epigenomic profiles, and the genome-wide enhancer-target gene regulatory network of lung cells was constructed by integrating chromatin three-dimensional architecture data. Lung cancers possessed a similar mutation burden at tissue-specific enhancers and exons but with differences in their mutation signatures. Functionally relevant alterations were prioritized on the basis of the pathway-level integration of the effect of a mutation and the frequency of mutations on individual enhancers. The genes enriched for mutated enhancers converged on the regulation of key biological processes and pathways relevant to tumor biology. Recurrent mutations in individual enhancers also affected the expression of target genes, with potential relevance for patient prognosis. Together, these findings show that noncoding regulatory mutations have a potential relevance for cancer pathogenesis and can be exploited for patient classification. SIGNIFICANCE: Mapping enhancer-target gene regulatory interactions and analyzing enhancer mutations at the level of their target genes and pathways reveal convergence of recurrent enhancer mutations on biological processes involved in tumorigenesis and prognosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".