MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387766709 · doi:10.21065/1925-7430.2.53

PHARMACOTHERAPEUTICAL STUDY OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

2012· article· en· W4387766709 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Applied Sciences · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealth and Medical Research Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyocardial infarctionCardiologyInternal medicineMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Consortium Publisher Canada - ICDTD Inc process and publish the scientific research data obtained after successful completion of the projects of relevant fields. We cover a wide range of academic disciplines including business, humanities, health, life and social sciences. We ensure the timely publication of high quality research work. Additionally, our all journald are open access and comply with the definition of Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) to fulfil the requirements of open access. The copyrights of scholarly published work is awarded for the usage of open license as described by Creative Commons.Consortium Publisher Canada is currently using the OJS of Public Knowledge Project (PKP). This is an open source software application, used to manage and publish our scholarly journals. It is a wide open source platform with over 10,000 usages worldwide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.350
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.195
GPT teacher head0.443
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Applied SciencesSame topicHealth and Medical Research ImpactsFrench-language works237,207