Determinants of Big Data Analytics (BDA) Adoption among Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Businesses must be innovative in the current "knowledge-based economy" if they intend to create and maintain a competitive advantage over rivals. The adoption of big data analytics (BDA) is thus revolutionary for precise decision-making and top performance in the present industrial environment. BDA application has attracted interest particularly due to the prospects and benefits that may be realized from its utilization in both academic and practical circles. Nevertheless, its adoption in small and medium-sized (SME) businesses is unknown thus far, prompting this study. To determine the determinants influencing SME preparedness to adopt BDA, the current study used the Technology Organization Environment (TOE) framework. The results supported the positive effects of BDA adoption on organizational marketing and financial performance in SMEs. Hence, understanding the factors influencing BDA acceptance enables managers to undertake the right initiatives, which are essential for its successful implementation. The outcomes also render it possible for BDA service providers to draw in and spread its prevalence among SME businesses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".