MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387786011 · doi:10.1200/po.23.00033

Adoption of Universal Testing in Endometrial Cancers for Microsatellite Instability Using Next-Generation Sequencing

2023· article· en· W4387786011 on OpenAlexaff
Isabel V. Rodriguez, Sarah Strickland, David N. Wells, Enna Manhardt, Eric Q. Konnick, Rochelle L. Garcia, Elizabeth M. Swisher, Mark Kilgore, Barbara M. Norquist

Bibliographic record

VenueJCO Precision Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsMicrosatellite instabilityEndometrial cancerExact testOncologyCohortInternal medicineMicrosatelliteMedicineLynch syndromeGenetic testingRetrospective cohort studyCancerDNA mismatch repairBiologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To assess implementation of a next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay to detect microsatellite instability (MSI) as a screen for Lynch syndrome (LS) in endometrial cancer (EC), while determining and comparing characteristics of the four molecular subtypes. METHODS: -test for continuous variables and chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. RESULTS: = .001). CONCLUSION: MSI by NGS allowed for simultaneous screening for LS and categorization of EC into molecular subtypes with prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.272
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.115 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJCO Precision OncologySame topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancerFrench-language works237,207