Drought‐induced fiber water release and xylem embolism susceptibility of intact balsam poplar saplings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Balsam poplar (Populus balsamifera L.) is a widespread tree species in North America with significant ecological and economic value. However, little is known about the susceptibility of saplings to drought-induced embolism and its link to water release from surrounding xylem fibers. Questions remain regarding localized mechanisms that contribute to the survival of saplings in vivo of this species under drought. Using X-ray micro-computed tomography on intact saplings of genotypes Gillam-5 and Carnduff-9, we found that functional vessels are embedded in a matrix of water-filled fibers under well-watered conditions in both genotypes. However, water-depleted fibers started to appear under moderate drought stress while vessels remained water-filled in both genotypes. Drought-induced xylem embolism susceptibility was comparable between genotypes, and a greater frequency of smaller diameter vessels in GIL-5 did not increase embolism resistance in this genotype. Despite having smaller vessels and a total vessel number that was comparable to CAR-9, stomatal conductance was generally higher in GIL-5 compared to CAR-9. In conclusion, our in vivo data on intact saplings indicate that differences in embolism susceptibility are negligible between GIL-5 and CAR-9, and that fiber water release should be considered as a mechanism that contributes to the maintenance of vessel functional status in saplings of balsam poplar experiencing their first drought event.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".