Combining IMU With Acoustics for Head Motion Tracking Leveraging Wireless Earphone
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Head motion tracking is a promising research field with vast applications in ubiquitous human-computer interaction (HCI) scenarios. Unfortunately, solutions based on vision and wireless sensing have shortcomings in user privacy and tracking range, respectively. To address these issues, we propose IA-Track, a novel head motion tracking system that combines inertial measurement units (IMU) and acoustic sensing. Our wireless earphone-based method balances flexibility, computational complexity, and tracking accuracy, requiring only an earphone with an IMU and a smartphone. However, we still face two challenges. First, wireless earphones have limited hardware resources, making acoustic Doppler effect-based method unsuitable for acoustic tracking. Second, traditional Kalman filter-based trajectory restoration methods may introduce significant cumulative errors. To tackle these challenges, we rely on IMU sensor data to recover the trajectory and use smartphones to emit ”inaudible” acoustic signals that the earphone receives to adjust the IMU drift track. We conducted extensive experiments involving 50 volunteers in various potential IA-Track usage scenarios, demonstrating that our well-designed system achieves satisfactory head motion tracking performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it