Energy Consumption Prediction Model for Smart Homes via Decentralized Federated Learning With LSTM
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rapid pace of development of the Internet of Things and the requirements of various devices have allowed us to perform calculations at the edge, especially in terms of consumer electronics. Such progress makes it possible to design new solutions for energy distribution and prediction for smart homes. In this paper, we propose a solution that can be used to optimize energy distribution by analyzing the energy demand in individual homes. The proposed methodology is based on edge technology, where a dedicated LSTM network with a multi-head self-attention network is trained with measurement data from different sensors for predicting energy demand. Training of this network is extended to a decentralized learning process with an additional aggregation decision module (that allows rejection of the model in case of worst adaptation to private data). In order to increase data security, we added a blockchain network with a Byzantine strategy and Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus. The solution was tested for a publicly available database in order to demonstrate the possibilities and advantages of such an architecture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it