MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387793627 · doi:10.1145/3623476

Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Software Language Engineering

2023· paratext· en· W4387793627 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware Engineering Techniques and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceITEA3Ministerio de Ciencia e InnovaciónITEAFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds National de la Recherche LuxembourgDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftVlaamse regeringEuropean CommissionNational Science Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceSoftware engineeringProgramming languageUsabilityModel transformationModeling languageSoftwareArtificial intelligenceHuman–computer interaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Welcome to the 16th ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Software Language Engineering (SLE) held in October 2023 as part of SPLASH 2023. Software Language Engineering (SLE) is a thriving research discipline targeted at establishing an engineering approach to the development, use, and maintenance of software languages, that is, of languages for the specification, modeling and tooling of software. Key topics of interest for SLE include approaches, methodologies and tools for language design and implementation with a focus on techniques for static and behavioral semantics, generative or interpretative approaches (including transformation languages and code generation) as well as meta-languages and tools (including language workbenches). Techniques enabling the testing, simulation or formal verification for language validation purposes are also of particular interest. SLE also accommodates empirical evaluation and experience reports of language engineering tools, such as user studies evaluating usability, performance benchmarks or industrial applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score0.668

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware Engineering Techniques and PracticesFrench-language works237,207