MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Nighttime Light Missing Data Retrieval Using Modis Version 6 Satellite Data and Mask Dilated Partial Convolutional Neural Network

2023· article· en· W4387801747 on OpenAlexaff
Xuanchen Liu, Shuxin Qiao, Kyle Gao, Hongjie He, Lingfei Ma, Jonathan Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicImpact of Light on Environment and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceConvolutional neural networkSatelliteArtificial intelligenceRemote sensingGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nighttime Lights (NTLs) remote sensing imagery contains tremendous information and has been shown to accurately predict a region’s human dynamics, economic health and energy consumption. Despite its usefulness, NTLs imagery is less widely available than other remote sensing data modalities. Several challenges appear when attempting to reconstruct NTLs data, either from other data modalities or existing NTLs data. These include complex non-linear relationships between NTLs and multispectral bands, non-matching spatial and temporal coverage, and different atmospheric and cloud conditions. This study attempts to create an out-of-the-box model that compensates for missing NTLs data using widely available daytime data in a broadly generalizable manner. The proposed project has two objectives: the construction of an image-to-image dataset mapping daytime multispectral images (MODIS V6 Land Surface Reflectance, MODIS V6 Land Cover, MODIS V6 Vegetation Indices) to NTLs images, and the reconstruction of NTLs data using deep learning techniques by researching, creating, and employing the state-of-the-art architecture of the Mask Partial Convolutional Neural Network in conjunction with dilated convolutions. The project will facilitate the training of new models for predicting missing NTLs and make NTLs data more accessible for future remote sensing research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImpact of Light on Environment and HealthFrench-language works237,207