DPAN: A Deep Light-Weight Attention-Based Image Super Resolution Network Using Multi-Dimensional Filter Design Technique
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-frequency components are the most crucial parts of the visual signals for the task of image super resolution. The deep image super resolution networks that are able to process the high-frequency components efficiently can provide high performances. In view of this, in this paper, we develop a new residual block for image super resolution, in which the feature attention process is carried out by focusing on various high-frequency components of the feature tensors. Specifically, we design a novel multi-dimensional filter design technique for the task of image super resolution, and employ it for obtaining a finite impulse response (FIR) high-pass filter bank to be embedded in a deep super resolution network for the feature attention process. Moreover, we utilize two other feature attention processes in the proposed residual block, namely, multi-scale transformerbased and convolutional learnable feature attention mechanisms, to generate rich sets of feature maps for a deep super resolution network. The results of different experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the various modules of the proposed residual block in enhancing the super resolution performance
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it