MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387807147 · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2023.10.012

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging Project for Lung Cancer: Proposals for the Revision of the N Descriptors in the Forthcoming Ninth Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer

2023· article· en· W4387807147 on OpenAlexfundno aff
James Huang, Raymond U. Osarogiagbon, Dorothy J. Giroux, Katherine K. Nishimura, Andrea Billè, Giuseppe Cardillo, Frank C. Detterbeck, Kemp H. Kernstine, Hong Kwan Kim, Yolande Lievens, Eric Lim, Edith M. Marom, Helmut Prosch, Paul Martin Putora, Ramón Rami–Porta, David C. Rice, Gaetano Rocco, Valerie W. Rusch, Isabelle Opitz, Francisco Suárez Vásquez, Paul Van Schil, Chi‐Fu Jeffrey Yang, Hisao Asamura

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Thoracic Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGenentechNational Institutes of HealthAIO-StudienInstituto Nacional do Câncer, Ministério da SaúdeShanghai Chest HospitalSoochow UniversityAstraZenecaUniversidade de São PauloInternational Association for the Study of Lung CancerUniversity of UlsanAnkara UniversitesiAix-Marseille UniversitéYale UniversityUniversity of TorontoBristol-Myers SquibbUniversity of LeicesterCleveland ClinicUniversité Hassan II de CasablancaMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterQueen's UniversityKeio UniversityBoehringer IngelheimOhio State UniversityNational Cancer InstituteArthrex GmbHGilead SciencesEli Lilly and CompanyPfizerLUNGevity Foundation
KeywordsMedicineNinthLung cancer stagingLung cancerMedical physicsAssociation (psychology)OncologyGeneral surgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.066
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.065
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.349

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0660.065
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.004
Bibliometrics0.0050.009
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0080.004
Research integrity0.0050.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.486
Teacher spread0.426 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations143
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Thoracic OncologySame topicLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207