MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387815420 · doi:10.1353/hcy.2023.a909984

Editor's Introduction

2023· article· en· W4387815420 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Linda Mahood

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the history of childhood and youth/˜The œjournal of the history of childhood and youth · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChildren's Rights and Participation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipPower (physics)NegotiationSociologyHistory of childhoodCurrencyModalitiesMedia studiesGender studiesHistorySocial scienceLawPolitical scienceMedicineChild abuse

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Editor's Introduction Linda Mahood As this issue goes to press, the 2023 biennial conference of the Society for the History of Children and Youth, held at the University of Guelph, Canada, has concluded. Two hundred hybrid panels, roundtables, plenaries, and keynote addresses were presented. As always, the Journal of the History of Childhood and Youth welcomes submissions on the history of childhood and youth from any period or location. Many articles in this issue focus on letters from children and young people and examine how scholars engage with them to understand how children have negotiated their place in the adult word. This issue opens with articles by Mona Gleason and Mashid Mayar. Both authors deploy theory to examine how childhood has been the currency of, and at stake in, the archival record. Here, and elsewhere in her influential scholarship, Gleason argues that child's history is a field open to new theory and scholarly practice. In "Children Obviously Don't Make History": Historical Significance and Children's Modalities of Power," Gleason adopts a "modalities of power" framework to show how children do, indeed, make history. Using examples from elementary school correspondence in British Columbia between 1919 and the late 1950s, Gleason develops the concept of "negotiated malleability" to highlight the way young people manipulate and negotiate predicaments with the adults who populate their daily lives. Mayar's "Playes Print the Letter": American Child(hoods) as Archival Present/ce" sees similarity in the notions of nostalgia, desire, fantasy, and power that bind Childhood Studies to Archival Studies. Examining letters that children sent to the juvenile periodical St. Nicholas in the 1890s, Mayar says the conflict at the center of the inaccessibility of childhood archival material is about the types of knowledge it promises to produce. Moving to the 1970s, Emily Gallagher's "Hidden in Plain Sight: Child-authored Material in Australian Museums and Archives" argues that historians have expressed frustration over the difficulties of locating children's voices in archives. By examining holdings of child art and writing in Australian collections, Gallagher show how children's documentary records [End Page 339] are far more voluminous than many scholars have previously acknowledged, comprising a surprisingly large array of children's art, writing, and audiovisual and material culture. If the archival record involves privileging certain pieces of evidence over others, it is a project that highlights normative sex, gender, and racial inequalities. Christina Burr's article about girl's leisure, fashion, and subculture also analyzes young people's writing. In "They Are Just Girls": Clara Bow's Star Persona, Female Adolescence, and the Flapper Youth Spectator," Burr argues that in the 1920s, a new confrontational type of adolescent femininity emerged—the flapper. The flapper may have been inspired by Hollywood movies; however, fan letters and testimonials show how girl moviegoers' reconstructed their own adolescent identities vis-à-vis the Hollywood ideal, as embodied by controversial silver screen icon, Clare Bow. Bow was the "it" girl who brought a dynamic, vivacious, impulsive, and sexualized appeal to the performance a new post–World War I feminine ideal. Shifting from sex and gender to political movements and educational socialization, Wayne Riggs' article focuses on World War I youth movements. In 1914, Britain had neither a conscript army nor any bureaucratic mechanism for implementing conscription. In "Church Brigades and Battlefields: Militarizing British Boys prior to World War I," Riggs contextualizes the intersection of youth, religion, and militarism in relation to Britain's successful recruitment efforts. Riggs says that boys' brigades fused military discipline and training with religious teaching that ensured that well over 50 percent of British boys received a form of military training. Consequently, by 1916, Britain had the world's largest volunteer army. Barbara Turk Niskač looks at print media and political education. In "The Ambiguous Nature of Children's Work in Socialist Yugoslavia: An Analysis based on Children's Magazine Pionirski list," the author analyzes the portrayal of work, play, and leisure in a children's magazine in socialist Yugoslavia. After breaking with the USSR, Yugoslavia embraced worker self-management as a socalled third way to socialism. Children's magazine Pionirski list built on Marxist notion of the ethos of the agricultural society's...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.038
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.261
Threshold uncertainty score0.872

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.038
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0100.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2610.131

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the history of childhood and youth/˜The œjournal of the history of childhood and youthSame topicChildren's Rights and ParticipationFrench-language works237,207