Improving Patient Safety Event Report Classification with Machine Learning and Contextual Text Representation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adverse events caused by medical errors pose a significant threat to patient safety, with estimates of 251,454 deaths and a cost of $17.1 billion to the healthcare system annually in the United States. Patient safety event (PSE) reports play a vital role in identifying measures to prevent adverse events, but their utility is dependent on the accurate classification of PSE reports. Recent studies have used static natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) techniques to automate PSE report classification. However, the use of static NLP has limitations in differentiating the meaning of words in disparate contexts, which can lead to inferior classification results. Thus, this study proposes to utilize contextual text representation produced from neural NLP methods to improve the accuracy of PSE report classification. The results suggest that the contextual text representation can further improve the performance of PSE classifiers. The best-performing classifier, a support vector machine trained with contextual text representation (Roberta-base) reaches an accuracy of 0.75 and a ROCAUC score of 0.94, surpassing all ML classifiers trained with static text representations. Furthermore, the confusion matrix of the best classifier exposes latent deficiencies in the PSE reports' classification taxonomy, such as the multi-class nature of PSE and conceptually related event types. The study's findings can save time for PSE reclassification, enhance the learning capabilities of the reporting system, ultimately improve patient safety.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".