Investigating the Attitudes of ESL Learners toward the English Language
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study aims to understand the attitude of undergraduate ESL learners toward English in the Mewat region of Haryana. It is also concerned with investigating how differences in demography govern ESL learners' learning patterns and habits. For this purpose, 400 students (which makes 10%) of the total population of 4000 students in various colleges of Mewat region were selected randomly to understand the patterns and their behaviour toward learning English. To carry out the research, a questionnaire was developed to gather data and collect the responses and attitudes of the ESL learners. The quantitative analysis was employed with the help of descriptive statistics, and one-way ANOVA. The analysis demonstrated that most of the participants have a high degree of motivation to learn English. It also suggested that there is no significant difference in their attitudes based on family income, the education level of their parents, and gender. As positive attitudes act as an important means of motivation for ESL learning, these findings will be of immense help to teachers to reinvent their teaching strategies and design their study material accordingly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it