Seismicity and seismic monitoring of Canada’s volcanic zones
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canada’s recently active volcanic zones (e.g., eruptions during the past 10 000 years) are all located along the tectonic plate boundary region of western Canada, extending for more than 2000 km from southern British Columbia to the Yukon/Alaska border. In this article, we describe the history of seismic monitoring in and near these volcanic zones and the past and current seismicity detection thresholds. The most recently active volcanoes in Canada are Tseax Cone (∼1700s) and Lava Fork (∼1800s), both in northwestern British Columbia. However, no eruptions have occurred in Canada since the deployment of the earliest seismographs in 1898 (Victoria, BC) and 1904 (Sitka, Alaska). Seismic detection levels have decreased from M∼7 in 1900 to M∼0–1 (in many regions) today, with more than 120 seismic stations currently operating in British Columbia and the Yukon, including ∼20 seismic stations within the volcanic zones. The most recent significant seismic activity attributed to volcanic zones in Canada is the 2007 Nazko Cone earthquake swarm when nearly 1000 tiny (M < 3) earthquakes occurred here over the span of about 2 months. These were all deep earthquakes (∼30 km) near the base of the crust and showed the patterns expected from an injection of magma deep into the crust. Prior to that, at the western end of the Anahim Volcanic Belt, more than 40 felt earthquakes occurred from 1940 to 1943. We provide a summary of these two swarms and other seismicity as well as some recent and ongoing studies into seismicity at some of Canada’s volcanic zones and new developments in seismic monitoring of volcanoes (including using distributed acoustic sensing).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".